1 |
On Tuesday, April 12, 2016 10:19:39 PM Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:17:38 +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote: |
3 |
> > > I don't use the meta packages, preferring to define my own set with |
4 |
> > > the packages I want, so I wasn't aware of Spectacle. I've just tried |
5 |
> > > it an is seems to do much the same as ksnapshot, just with a lot more |
6 |
> > > white space in the UI |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > Don't forget: |
9 |
> > - No auto-incrementing of screenshot-numbers |
10 |
> > - Always defaults to PNG (Why!?!!?!) |
11 |
> > - Always defaults to a the ~/Pictures folder |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > (Folder can be adjusted in the settings, but why not the previous |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > one) |
16 |
> > - When wanting to use "save as...", you first need to click the little |
17 |
> > triangle |
18 |
> |
19 |
> OK I accept when you start to actually use it rather than just giving it |
20 |
> a try, it sucks!! |
21 |
|
22 |
Yep. |
23 |
Most common use-case for me (eg. once a month) is to take screenshots of the |
24 |
timesheet-application used at my customer to forward to my manager. |
25 |
The "window" is a remote desktop of which I only need a certain section. |
26 |
|
27 |
With KSnapshot the whole process takes less then 5 minutes. |
28 |
With Spectacle it took me 30 minutes... |
29 |
|
30 |
> > > - but WTF do they block one another, they're only screen shot |
31 |
> > > programs? |
32 |
> > |
33 |
> > I read somewhere there is a "wrapper" included to call Spectacle when |
34 |
> > someone tries to start "ksnapshot"... |
35 |
> |
36 |
> So it's a "compatibility layer" for people so stupid they shouldn't be |
37 |
> running Gentoo in the first place... |
38 |
|
39 |
Apparently. |
40 |
But Alan McKinnon said the blockage is actually pointless as there is no |
41 |
conflict... |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Joost |