1 |
Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@××××××.de> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> Or maybe just by experience in using the tool it would get handier |
4 |
>> and faster.... |
5 |
> |
6 |
> Just doing the automatic stuff, where no user intervention is involved _is_ |
7 |
> blazingly fast. How fast you are in running the diff/merge tool of _your_ |
8 |
> choice is, well, up to you. |
9 |
|
10 |
Maybe, but as you know it defaults to xxdiff. That of course is not |
11 |
to say it cannot be changed but by default the merge tool is slow and |
12 |
clunky. |
13 |
|
14 |
>> Using xxdiff is pretty clunky and slow I thought. I would not |
15 |
>> describe it as blazingly fast. |
16 |
|
17 |
> You were not talking about xxdiff, you wrote that cfg-update was slow. |
18 |
|
19 |
You seem to imply that cfg-update is independent of a diff tool. It |
20 |
does not appear to be able to merge anything on its own. |
21 |
|
22 |
So to speak of cfg-update minus a diff tool as fast/slow seems a |
23 |
little off the mark. |
24 |
|
25 |
I suspect you are a much more accomplished user than I am so I'll |
26 |
defer to your judgement... |
27 |
|
28 |
I'm curious about the backup setup. Have you had occasion to go |
29 |
back into the database to pull out an old config? And if so I |
30 |
wondered if that part worked to your liking? |
31 |
|
32 |
It might allow me to quit putting all my configs under cvs control. |
33 |
That can get to be a bit of a hassle at times.. |