1 |
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 2:28 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 3:39 AM, Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> |
5 |
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/graphics-drivers/000005520.html |
6 |
> ev says that everything up to Intel HD 620 is supported. It is |
7 |
> probably reasonable to assume that a HD 630 device is supported. |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
OTOH, the gentoo WiKi https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Intel seems to |
11 |
imply that the commitment of Intel with Linux may be somewhat |
12 |
colder... |
13 |
|
14 |
> |
15 |
> There are Intel HD devices, but there are also Iris devices. Per |
16 |
> marketing materials I found the Iris line is intended to be |
17 |
> distributed with higher-end computers for "professional" use. Do Iris |
18 |
> and HD devices actually differ in driver support or is it mostly the |
19 |
> name that shows up in lspci or Window's device manager that differs? |
20 |
|
21 |
First time I read about it. Wikipedia |
22 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_HD_and_Iris_Graphics has a few |
23 |
tables suggesting Iris is higher end stuff. I don't know about kernel |
24 |
support. |
25 |
> |