Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Michael <confabulate@××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to misconfigure USB ports in the kernel?
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 18:44:56
Message-Id: 2186968.ElGaqSPkdT@lenovo.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to misconfigure USB ports in the kernel? by Michael
1 On Thursday, 26 November 2020 00:10:00 GMT Michael wrote:
2 > On Wednesday, 25 November 2020 17:37:15 GMT Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
3 > > Greetings,
4 > >
5 > > since my old 64 GB Verbatim USB sticks became too small, I bought two
6 > > new 128 GB Philips sticks. Because I need to read and write them on
7 > > both, a stand-alone Windows laptop (not connected to the internet) runn-
8 > > ing Windows Vista and Cygwin and my Gentoo laptop, I encrypted them with
9 > > old TrueCrypt on the Windows box, using them under Gentoo in TrueCrypt
10 > > compatibility mode.
11 > >
12 > > This worked well with the Verbatim USB sticks (which probably are USB
13 > > 2.0), but while reading the new USB 3.0 Philips USB sticks is signific-
14 > > antly faster than reading the old Verbatim USB sticks, writing to them
15 > > is slow as hell under Gentoo. And writing to the Philips USB sticks on
16 > > the old Vista laptop with USB 2.0 ports clearly outperforms writing to
17 > > them using the Gentoo laptop's USB 3.0 ports.
18 > >
19 > > This could be a problem with TrueCrypt/VeraCrypt or with somehow miscon-
20 > > figured USB ports. To check for the latter I provide below all kernel
21 > > configuration variables I regard USB related in the hope that some know-
22 >
23 > > ledgable people might find a glitch in there:
24 > Check dmesg to see if initialisation of the USB 3.0 drive throws up any
25 > errors. Then check 'lsusb -t' to make sure it has been recognised as a USB
26 > 3.0.
27 >
28 > If write operations without TrueCrypt/VeraCrypt are equally slow, then
29 > obviously the problem is not with encryption.
30 >
31 > I've read in a number of articles the erase block size on most USB flash
32 > (NAND) is 128KB, which incurs a lot of operations on a write, when using
33 > Linux with its 4K size sectors. Partitioning the USB drive to use 128KB
34 > sectors and then aligning the fs on it should improve matters.
35 >
36 > I found this article which mentions an experiment with ext4 fs. A more
37 > effective search should hopefully bring up examples on FAT fs.
38 >
39 > HTH.
40
41 Apologies, I seem to have forgotten to include the link. Here's another link
42 I came across today and which offers more detail on this topic:
43
44 http://wiki.laptop.org/go/How_to_Damage_a_FLASH_Storage_Device

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature