| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Rafael Barrera Oro <borafael@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Thank you both for your responses, i will try dealing with QT first and then |
| 3 |
> emerge udev separately, without any mercilless barbaric |
| 4 |
> running-around-barely-dressed-waving-an-axe-around unmerging. |
| 5 |
It'll be faster do do udev first. Get it done and over with. |
| 6 |
Qt will take 2+ hours to compile. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> I'm gonna miss the sledgehammer though... |
| 9 |
I sledgehammer my way through blocks and no problems here :D |
| 10 |
> Seroiusly, thanks very much for your help |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> PD: As soon as i get it done i will tell how the outcome was |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> 2008/10/29 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> On Wednesday 29 October 2008 18:41:47 Andrey Vul wrote: |
| 17 |
>> > > [blocks B ] <sys-fs/udev-114 ("<sys-fs/udev-114" is blocking |
| 18 |
>> > > media-gfx/sane-backends-1.0.19-r2, media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.2) |
| 19 |
>> > > |
| 20 |
>> > > My usual solution for problems of this kind is to mercilessly unmerge |
| 21 |
>> > > any |
| 22 |
>> > > packages that stand in my way, but, considering we are talking about |
| 23 |
>> > > packages like qt and udev, i must admit i do not dare to follow my |
| 24 |
>> > > usual |
| 25 |
>> > > strategy. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Instead of unmerging stuff without mercy, taking a sledgehammer to the |
| 28 |
>> problem |
| 29 |
>> and generally acting like a Windows user, I recommend you read the output |
| 30 |
>> and |
| 31 |
>> understand what is going on. |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> It clearly says that your *current* version of udev which is less than 114 |
| 34 |
>> is |
| 35 |
>> blocking sane-backends and libgphoto. So, merge udev separately: |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> emerge -av1 udev |
| 38 |
I prefer emerge -1pv udev |
| 39 |
<look at output> |
| 40 |
emerge -1 udev |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
>> there's no need for udev to go in world, it's already in system. Then |
| 43 |
>> emerge |
| 44 |
>> world and it will probably work (after you deal with qt that is, but |
| 45 |
>> another |
| 46 |
>> poster told you how to do that) |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-- |
| 50 |
Andrey Vul |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. |
| 53 |
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? |
| 54 |
A: Top-posting. |
| 55 |
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? |
Archives