| 1 |
On Monday 29 May 2006 00:43, Teresa and Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: |
| 3 |
> >On Monday 29 May 2006 00:10, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: |
| 4 |
> >>Sunday 28 May 2006 21:48 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin: |
| 5 |
> >>>>This change could be a |
| 6 |
> >>>>bugfix. By making your own digest you don't get this bugfix... |
| 7 |
> >>> |
| 8 |
> >>>more probably - the mirror corrupted the file. Or someone replaced it |
| 9 |
> >>>with a hacked package. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >>While that is possible I'm not really sure why you consider it more |
| 12 |
> >> likely. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >because I know at least one mirror which regularly corrupts files. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Don't use that one. LOL Which is it so the rest of us can avoid it? |
| 17 |
> Why ask for problems when we have enough already. ;-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I am using it becaue I am only allowed to download a certain volume per month |
| 20 |
and downloading from that mirror is 'free' for me - the traffic to and from |
| 21 |
that one does not add up onto my free traffic. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives