1 |
Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto wrote: |
2 |
>>>> Give this a shot: |
3 |
>>>> |
4 |
>>>> VIDEO_CARDS="nvidia" |
5 |
>>>> |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>> No, "nvidia" is for the proprietary binary nvida driver. The free |
8 |
>>> driver for nvidia cards is called NV. I have a GeForce4 MX 440 and I |
9 |
>>> have this in my make.conf: |
10 |
>>> VIDEO_CARDS="nv vesa" |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>> What you say may be true, pretty sure it is, but what he is doing is not |
13 |
>> working, hence him coming here for help. Since I have nvidia in mine |
14 |
>> and it works fine, thought he may want to try that. What I posted is |
15 |
>> not wrong, just another way of doing it. Up to him if he wants to try |
16 |
>> it or not. |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Also, nv does not work well for me either. It is dreadfully slow and |
19 |
>> uses a lot of CPU time. At least that is how it was the last time I |
20 |
>> used it. Things change. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> Dale |
23 |
>> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Selecting "nvidia" instead of "nv" would hardly make a difference in |
26 |
> this specific problem. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Also I imagine that the nv driver would be the more likely to work, |
29 |
> being free software and maintainable by the Xorg developers. As for |
30 |
> being slow, everybody knows it (unfortunately; damned be Nvida*) does |
31 |
> not support 3D, so any 3D you use will be in software. But for 2D, it |
32 |
> is as fast as the proprietary driver AFAIK. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Are you saying that it is slower in 2D than the proprietary driver? |
35 |
> |
36 |
> *If if were to buy a video card today, it wouldn't be Nvidia. But I |
37 |
> don't play 3D games so I won't buy a new card anyway. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
Yes, when I used nv a long time ago, it was very slow and it used a LOT |
43 |
of my CPU time as well. It was like the CPU was doing the work instead |
44 |
of the card. I emerged the nvidia drivers and have stuck with them ever |
45 |
since. |
46 |
|
47 |
Keep in mind I bought my nvidia card several years ago. Back then the |
48 |
ATI support was nasty to say the least. ATI was not a viable option at |
49 |
that time. Nvidia was the king as far as video cards go. That seems to |
50 |
have changed and most likely I will get ATI next time, though I like |
51 |
nvidia but hey . . . .they made their choice and I have to make mine |
52 |
based on theirs. |
53 |
|
54 |
I do agree that nv should work, I guess the old 'your mileage may vary' |
55 |
comes in tho. |
56 |
|
57 |
Dale |
58 |
|
59 |
:-) :-) |