Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@×××.edu>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Preventing a package from being updated
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:14:44
Message-Id: yu98w1pa9ev.fsf@nyu.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Preventing a package from being updated by Alan McKinnon
1 Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> writes:
2
3 > Apparently, though unproven, at 16:11 on Friday 22 October 2010, Allan
4 > Gottlieb did opine thusly:
5 >
6 > [snip]
7 >
8 >> Perhaps I should be downgrading xorg-server as well.
9 >
10 > Masking mesa-7.8.2 means (per the ebuilds) you will have to drop back to
11 > xorg-server-1.7.7-r1. Both are latest stable versions.
12
13 See below
14
15 >>
16 >> Since I would rather have a slow X than an angry portage,
17 >> I removed the package mask and expected all to be well, but was
18 >> surprised by the following. In particular at the end it says there is
19 >> one block but I don't see any.
20 >
21 > [snip]
22 >
23 > Here you go:
24 >
25 >
26 >> [blocks b ] <sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.2-r6
27 >> ("<sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.2-r6" is blocking sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.2-r3)
28 >> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.2-r6 [4.1.4.2-r5] USE="cracklib
29 >> nls pam -audit (-selinux) -skey" 1,749 kB
30
31 I really did look for b's, but didn't see it. I guess I was looking
32 near the ] where all the U's are. Embarrassing, to say the least.
33 Thanks.
34
35 Now I have masked mesa-7.8.2 downgrading to 7.7.1, which necessitated a
36 downgrade of xorg-server to 1.7.7-r1 (latest stable), which necessitated
37 a downgrade of xinit to 1.2.1.
38
39 Thus my emerges now generate msgs that updates to xorg-server and xinit
40 are being skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies.
41 Other than this, the emerges perform normally and the system runs well.
42
43 I could mask the newer versions of xorg-server and xinit and possibly
44 prevent the emerge messages, but I am leaning toward leaving it as it is.
45 This way when mesa is updated (to a hopefully fixed version) everything
46 should update automatically.
47
48 Does that sound reasonable.
49
50 thanks again,
51 allan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Preventing a package from being updated Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>