1 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 16:11 on Friday 22 October 2010, Allan |
4 |
> Gottlieb did opine thusly: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> [snip] |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> Perhaps I should be downgrading xorg-server as well. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Masking mesa-7.8.2 means (per the ebuilds) you will have to drop back to |
11 |
> xorg-server-1.7.7-r1. Both are latest stable versions. |
12 |
|
13 |
See below |
14 |
|
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Since I would rather have a slow X than an angry portage, |
17 |
>> I removed the package mask and expected all to be well, but was |
18 |
>> surprised by the following. In particular at the end it says there is |
19 |
>> one block but I don't see any. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> [snip] |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Here you go: |
24 |
> |
25 |
> |
26 |
>> [blocks b ] <sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.2-r6 |
27 |
>> ("<sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.2-r6" is blocking sys-auth/consolekit-0.4.2-r3) |
28 |
>> [ebuild U ] sys-apps/shadow-4.1.4.2-r6 [4.1.4.2-r5] USE="cracklib |
29 |
>> nls pam -audit (-selinux) -skey" 1,749 kB |
30 |
|
31 |
I really did look for b's, but didn't see it. I guess I was looking |
32 |
near the ] where all the U's are. Embarrassing, to say the least. |
33 |
Thanks. |
34 |
|
35 |
Now I have masked mesa-7.8.2 downgrading to 7.7.1, which necessitated a |
36 |
downgrade of xorg-server to 1.7.7-r1 (latest stable), which necessitated |
37 |
a downgrade of xinit to 1.2.1. |
38 |
|
39 |
Thus my emerges now generate msgs that updates to xorg-server and xinit |
40 |
are being skipped due to unsatisfied dependencies. |
41 |
Other than this, the emerges perform normally and the system runs well. |
42 |
|
43 |
I could mask the newer versions of xorg-server and xinit and possibly |
44 |
prevent the emerge messages, but I am leaning toward leaving it as it is. |
45 |
This way when mesa is updated (to a hopefully fixed version) everything |
46 |
should update automatically. |
47 |
|
48 |
Does that sound reasonable. |
49 |
|
50 |
thanks again, |
51 |
allan |