| 1 |
Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: |
| 3 |
>> (Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9) |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/ |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The proper thing to do |
| 8 |
> would be to open a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org and request a version |
| 9 |
> bump. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Thanks for replying |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I've tried bugs (under admin, iirc), and always get notes telling me |
| 14 |
that my version info. post doesn't belong there, and deleting my |
| 15 |
submission. If there is a category for version bumps, I haven't figure |
| 16 |
it out. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I wasn't going to say anything (I love Gentoo and don't want to be a |
| 19 |
complainer), but rtkthunter and chkrootkit are arguably important |
| 20 |
packages for newbies like me. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
(fwiw, I imagine that others, like me, have a few packages - especially |
| 23 |
those linked to online activity, or security issues (e.g. maradns, |
| 24 |
runit, rtkthunter, chkrootkit, vidalia, etc.) that are simply maintained |
| 25 |
from source, hoping that portage someday catch up :-( ) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives