| 1 |
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 18:46 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: |
| 2 |
> Florian Philipp wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 14:38 -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> (Portage is a little dated at 1.2.9) |
| 5 |
> >> |
| 6 |
> >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/rkhunter/ |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > Thanks for the info but this doesn't belong here. The proper thing to do |
| 9 |
> > would be to open a bug on http://bugs.gentoo.org and request a version |
| 10 |
> > bump. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Thanks for replying |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I've tried bugs (under admin, iirc), and always get notes telling me |
| 15 |
> that my version info. post doesn't belong there, and deleting my |
| 16 |
> submission. If there is a category for version bumps, I haven't figure |
| 17 |
> it out. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
As I understand it, Admin is meant for administrative purposes of the |
| 20 |
Gentoo-project as a whole. I'd post it in Gentoo Linux. Most of the |
| 21 |
time, Gentoo Linux is the right place for version bumps. Since this is |
| 22 |
also security-related, you could argue for Gentoo Security but this is |
| 23 |
meant for Security holes and stuff like that. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Of course, it would have been better if the bug wrangler had |
| 26 |
moved your bug to the right place or at least told you where to file |
| 27 |
it. If you think you've been treated wrong, feel free to file a bug in |
| 28 |
User Relations but I'd rather not. Jakub and the other bug wrangler |
| 29 |
might seem rude from time to time but they are doing quiet a hard job |
| 30 |
very well when trying to keep pace with the input of bugs. That's why I |
| 31 |
wouldn't take such things personally. |
Archives