1 |
David Leverton ha scritto: |
2 |
> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 23:18:42 b.n. wrote: |
3 |
>> I am not going to do it because of the treatment I'd be reserved by people |
4 |
>> like ciaranm, or you, if I only needed help or disagreed with your opinions. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> What on Earth makes you think that? |
7 |
|
8 |
Your behaviour. |
9 |
The IRC log posted on the r0bertz blog. |
10 |
|
11 |
Just two examples. |
12 |
|
13 |
> Volker is certainly not asking for help, |
14 |
> and he is not merely "disagreeing", but preaching his gospel of lies at every |
15 |
> conceivable opportunity. If you don't do that (which is surely wise in any |
16 |
> case) you won't receive the corresponding response. |
17 |
|
18 |
This is paranoid behaviour. |
19 |
To think that there is a "hate campaign" about your little software is |
20 |
utterly paranoid. You are not Linux, no Microsoft is doing a "get the |
21 |
facts" campaign on you. Actually, I'm pretty sure >99.999% of world |
22 |
population just doesn't care about your software. :) |
23 |
|
24 |
That said, I don't agree with everything Volker says (frankly I saw no |
25 |
problem at all with a paludis-only overlay, and I said that before, and |
26 |
I don't think there is a "paludis conspiracy" just like I don't think |
27 |
there is an "anti-paludis conspiracy"), and Volker's tone was not better |
28 |
than yours. |
29 |
|
30 |
But I'm sure that he talks this way because he's actually concerned |
31 |
about your software and the behaviour of your community. And reading |
32 |
stuff like the IRC logs of ciaranm (and you defending his behaviour) I |
33 |
can't but agree. |
34 |
|
35 |
None of you was constructive in the discussion. For example, a |
36 |
sub-thread went this way: Volker said Paludis is bloated. You answered |
37 |
"no it's not". He said "yes it is" and then it became a sensless |
38 |
blah-blah "liar-liar". Why don't you just go at your desks, count lines |
39 |
of code/features/memory consuption/executable size/whatever fits your |
40 |
measures of "bloated" and decide numerically what's bloated or not? |
41 |
|
42 |
Moreover, as I told you some time ago, the only way to shut up lies is |
43 |
*facts*. In software, facts means code. You can take it as, think, a |
44 |
contest. He says Paludis is bloated? Let's compare them, and, in the |
45 |
meantime, let's aggressively reduce memory consumption! Let's modularize |
46 |
it (if it's not already), so everyone can have his pet features without |
47 |
complaining. If it's already modular, let's write the appropriate plugin |
48 |
and tell him "see how easy it was?". Et cetera. When you will have huge, |
49 |
undeniable facts on your side, you won't need to fear any "conspiracy". |
50 |
And if someone still denies them, well, let's make those facts even |
51 |
huger and more solid -that is, go and code again. |
52 |
|
53 |
That way you not only will win your flamewars with more arguments, but |
54 |
make the life of users better. |
55 |
|
56 |
m. |