1 |
On Friday 24 Feb 2012 07:30:01 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
2 |
> On 24/02/12 07:02, pk wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2012-02-24 05:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
4 |
> >> user can watch. Flash on the other hand guarantees web designers that a |
5 |
> >> PC user can watch their videos. Having a guarantee that something works |
6 |
> >> is a very powerful incentive; you do not abandon something that works. |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > It's only guaranteed if flash is installed. HTML5 is pretty much |
9 |
> > "guaranteed" with current browsers. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Flash has about 95% coverage. That means virtually everyone has it |
12 |
> installed. HTML5 on the other hand does not guarantee video playback. |
13 |
> If you're on Firefox for example, it won't play MPEG video, but will |
14 |
> play Theora. If you're on IE or Safari, it won't play Theora but will |
15 |
> play MPEG. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> With Flash, you *know* that it will play your video. You don't have to |
18 |
> like it, but it's a fact; an important one. Yeah, I know, sucks for |
19 |
> Linux which has poor Flash support, but what can you do? This is a |
20 |
> reality and you can't blame people for choosing the safe bet. |
21 |
|
22 |
The thing is that apple smartphones and tablets do not offer flash. Desktop |
23 |
volumes are in decline, while smartphones and tablets sales are increasing. |
24 |
This could be seasonal of course, but if the future moves away from the flash |
25 |
capable desktop, then flash will become increasingly obsolete. |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Regards, |
28 |
Mick |