1 |
On 24/02/12 07:02, pk wrote: |
2 |
> On 2012-02-24 05:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> user can watch. Flash on the other hand guarantees web designers that a |
5 |
>> PC user can watch their videos. Having a guarantee that something works |
6 |
>> is a very powerful incentive; you do not abandon something that works. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It's only guaranteed if flash is installed. HTML5 is pretty much |
9 |
> "guaranteed" with current browsers. |
10 |
|
11 |
Flash has about 95% coverage. That means virtually everyone has it |
12 |
installed. HTML5 on the other hand does not guarantee video playback. |
13 |
If you're on Firefox for example, it won't play MPEG video, but will |
14 |
play Theora. If you're on IE or Safari, it won't play Theora but will |
15 |
play MPEG. |
16 |
|
17 |
With Flash, you *know* that it will play your video. You don't have to |
18 |
like it, but it's a fact; an important one. Yeah, I know, sucks for |
19 |
Linux which has poor Flash support, but what can you do? This is a |
20 |
reality and you can't blame people for choosing the safe bet. |