1 |
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 18:52:00 Alex Schuster wrote: |
2 |
> Alan McKinnon writes: |
3 |
> > On Monday 16 November 2009 21:40:42 Alex Schuster wrote: |
4 |
> > > Alan McKinnon writes: |
5 |
> > > > I get errors like this whenever amarok updates the collection: |
6 |
> > > > |
7 |
> > > > amarok: [ERROR!] GREPME MySQL query failed! No database |
8 |
> > > > selected on "INSERT INTO images SELECT * FROM images_temp;" |
9 |
> > > |
10 |
> > > Not here. Sometimes the collection gets screwed up a little, but I do |
11 |
> > > not get any output when re-scanning the collection. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> It just happened again. I added a new folder to my /data/mp3 hierarchy |
14 |
> (metal), put some folders of music into it, marked it as collection folder |
15 |
> and told amarok to re-scan the collection. When I search for 'metallica', |
16 |
> it finds 'Rapoon'. When I drag a metallica album folder directly into |
17 |
> amarok, it shows the album's name correctly, but the artist is 'Rapoon'. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I unmarked all of my collection's folders, let amarok re-scan, and now the |
20 |
> collection is empty. I added all the folders again, scanned, and I have |
21 |
> the same problem. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> I deleted ~/.kde4/share/apps/amarok/mysqle, started amarok and let it |
24 |
> scan, now all is fine again. Seems I have to do this once in a while. |
25 |
|
26 |
To me, that is intolerable on production code with a version number of 2.2.0. |
27 |
It' supposed to be mature, it's not supposed to trash it's own data store! |
28 |
What o you think would happen if Firefox dumped it's browser history and |
29 |
cookies once a week in sync with phases of the moon? |
30 |
|
31 |
If any vendor tried to sell me crap code like that at work, they would be out |
32 |
the door on their arse |
33 |
|
34 |
[snip] |
35 |
|
36 |
> > Amarok, it was nice knowing you. One day you might build and play music |
37 |
> > again on all sane systems out there. Meanwhile, I think I want to hear |
38 |
> > songs play so some other player is going on this machine and you are |
39 |
> > coming off. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> What about using amarok 1.4, until 2.x works fine for you? |
42 |
|
43 |
1.4 links to kdelibs-3.5 right? I just spent nearly a year getting rid of 3.5 |
44 |
apps... |
45 |
|
46 |
> Mine does not work any longer, though. Just noted this when I started it |
47 |
> to compare with the 2.2 one, did not do this a while ago. |
48 |
> /usr/kde/3.5/bin/amarok immediately throws an 'illegal instruction' error. |
49 |
> Huh? I did not change my CFLAGS, they are "-march=k8-sse3 -mfpmath=sse -O2 |
50 |
> -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer" on a AMD Athlon 4850e. The k8-sse3 should be |
51 |
> sane, gcc -Q --help=target -march=native lists it. I am not sure where I |
52 |
> got the -mfpmath=sse from. I rebuilt amarok 1.4, and get the same error, |
53 |
> probably somewhere in kdelibs or such stuff. Strange. Let's see if this |
54 |
> happens with other stuff, too. |
55 |
|
56 |
that looks like you built amarok with binutils-2.20. It affects many apps. Try |
57 |
downgrade binutils, rebuild offending apps and see if it makes a difference. |
58 |
Or you could try rebuild current binutils with USE=gold. I have no idea what |
59 |
it does, but there's a few references on b.g.o. about this working in some |
60 |
cases. |
61 |
|
62 |
|
63 |
-- |
64 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |