| 1 |
On Friday 12 Aug 2016 16:36:37 Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2016-08-11, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wednesday 10 Aug 2016 15:21:54 Philip Webb wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> 160810 Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 5 |
> >> > I've been using KMail for many years. It suits me in many ways, |
| 6 |
> >> > the most important being that I don't need to keep switching my hands |
| 7 |
> >> > between mouse and keyboard. |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> If that's your criterion, why not try Mutt ? |
| 10 |
> >> I've been using it for c 20 years & have never wanted anything else. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > How does it display HTML in messages? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I have it set to run them through lynx (or links, or w3m, I forget) by |
| 15 |
> default and display the results in the normal pager. If I hit "p" it |
| 16 |
> uses Firefox. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks all for your contributions. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I know that Mutt has a large, loyal following, but I think I'd prefer to |
| 21 |
stick to a graphical MUA, having grown used to it over the years. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Rgds |
| 25 |
Peter |
Archives