Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Arsen Arsenović" <arsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Wol <antlists@××××××××××××.uk>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is it OK to get rid of app-alternatives/* ?
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:50:30
Message-Id: 86zg9epv2h.fsf@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is it OK to get rid of app-alternatives/* ? by Wol
1 Hi,
2
3 Wol <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> writes:
4
5 > On 15/02/2023 15:51, Daniel Frey wrote:
6 >> On 2/15/23 06:10, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
7 >>> On 2023-02-15 08:11:46, Neil Bothwick wrote:
8 >>>>
9 >>>> If, as you say, it will eventually replace eselect, there is no more
10 >>>> bloat, just different bloat. It's still just a bunch of symlinks, but
11 >>>> managed differently.
12 >>>>
13 >>>
14 >>> Should be less, since you already have portage installed but not
15 >>> necessarily eselect-whatever.
16 >>>
17 >> I didn't even know eselect-whatever was even an option until this
18 >> post... It's not something I've ever used.
19 >> It does (at least to me) make sense for the package manager to enforce these
20 >> selections rather than some optional tool though.
21 >>
22 > what are they going to do about "eselect kernel set ..." then?
23 >
24 > It's bad enough depclean deleting the active kernel if you don't watch out,
25 > without something deciding to install a non-existent kernel and deleting the
26 > live one :-)
27
28 This is part of the motivation behind the dist-kernel project. See:
29 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Distribution_Kernel
30
31 As an anecdote, I haven't thought about what my kernel and modules are
32 doing in a very long time, and I use multiple out of tree modules.
33
34 Happy hacking and have a great day.
35 --
36 Arsen Arsenović

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature