1 |
On 15/02/2023 15:51, Daniel Frey wrote: |
2 |
> On 2/15/23 06:10, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2023-02-15 08:11:46, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
4 |
>>> |
5 |
>>> If, as you say, it will eventually replace eselect, there is no more |
6 |
>>> bloat, just different bloat. It's still just a bunch of symlinks, but |
7 |
>>> managed differently. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Should be less, since you already have portage installed but not |
11 |
>> necessarily eselect-whatever. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
> |
14 |
> I didn't even know eselect-whatever was even an option until this |
15 |
> post... It's not something I've ever used. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> It does (at least to me) make sense for the package manager to enforce |
18 |
> these selections rather than some optional tool though. |
19 |
> |
20 |
what are they going to do about "eselect kernel set ..." then? |
21 |
|
22 |
It's bad enough depclean deleting the active kernel if you don't watch |
23 |
out, without something deciding to install a non-existent kernel and |
24 |
deleting the live one :-) |
25 |
|
26 |
Cheers, |
27 |
Wol |