| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 09:28 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:40:49 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > However, when I first used gentoo I was always the first in my LUG to |
| 5 |
> > have the latest kde, evolution, mplayer etc, and that was running x86 |
| 6 |
> > not ~x86. My perception is that gentoo is no longer first off the block |
| 7 |
> > with stable releases. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I think some of this confusion is caused by the way people switch between |
| 10 |
> two uses of the word stable. It can mean "doesn't crash", but then most |
| 11 |
> upstream latest packages fit there, and some long standing releases |
| 12 |
> don't. It can also mean "not changing" and this is what some people want |
| 13 |
> from a distribution. If you run a server farm, you don't want to be |
| 14 |
> continually upgrading just to get new features you don't need, you just |
| 15 |
> want a system that works with timely security fixes. This is why Debian |
| 16 |
> stable is so old, because for these people, old is good. Look at the |
| 17 |
> situation with Firefox recently, where a new testing ebuild seemed to |
| 18 |
> come out almost as soon as the previous one finished building. Great for |
| 19 |
> those who want the latest and greatest, not so good for those who want a |
| 20 |
> stable system. Gentoo gives you the choice, and even lets you pick and |
| 21 |
> mix, so don't complain because you make an unsuitable choice. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> If you want the latest now, you need to use the testing packages, because |
| 24 |
> the QA rules demand they remain in testing for a while. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Thanks, Neil. Already have begun testing my luck with the testing |
| 28 |
packages. I'll see what happens. Thanks for your explanation of the |
| 29 |
testking packages. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives