1 |
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:40:49 +1200, Nick Rout wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> However, when I first used gentoo I was always the first in my LUG to |
4 |
> have the latest kde, evolution, mplayer etc, and that was running x86 |
5 |
> not ~x86. My perception is that gentoo is no longer first off the block |
6 |
> with stable releases. |
7 |
|
8 |
I think some of this confusion is caused by the way people switch between |
9 |
two uses of the word stable. It can mean "doesn't crash", but then most |
10 |
upstream latest packages fit there, and some long standing releases |
11 |
don't. It can also mean "not changing" and this is what some people want |
12 |
from a distribution. If you run a server farm, you don't want to be |
13 |
continually upgrading just to get new features you don't need, you just |
14 |
want a system that works with timely security fixes. This is why Debian |
15 |
stable is so old, because for these people, old is good. Look at the |
16 |
situation with Firefox recently, where a new testing ebuild seemed to |
17 |
come out almost as soon as the previous one finished building. Great for |
18 |
those who want the latest and greatest, not so good for those who want a |
19 |
stable system. Gentoo gives you the choice, and even lets you pick and |
20 |
mix, so don't complain because you make an unsuitable choice. |
21 |
|
22 |
If you want the latest now, you need to use the testing packages, because |
23 |
the QA rules demand they remain in testing for a while. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Neil Bothwick |
28 |
|
29 |
Windows Multitasking - screwing up several things at once |