1 |
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: |
2 |
> On Wednesday 10 February 2010 11:38:52 Neil Bothwick wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:24:36 -0600, Dale wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>>> hal is a classic "Second System Effect" case |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> But I thought we thrashed this to death a while ago and all agreed to |
9 |
>>>> never speak of this abomination again, while we await the Third |
10 |
>>>> System Effect aka DeviceKit? |
11 |
>>>> |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>>> From what I read it appears to be the same guy doing both. Maybe, |
14 |
>>> |
15 |
>>> just maybe, some lessons were learned and it will be a lot better. |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>> Isn't that the point of redoing it? It's when someone else comes along |
18 |
>> with brand new way of doing things that we get a whole load of brand new |
19 |
>> problems? |
20 |
>> |
21 |
> It really is the same guy. His blog said something to the effect of: |
22 |
> |
23 |
> "hal is a load of crap. I knew it long ago, the other devs knew it slightly |
24 |
> less longer ago and the users now know it too. We were trying to do too much |
25 |
> and shoehorn too many things into the same boxes that belonged in different |
26 |
> boxes. I'm fed up trying to maintain this steaming mess, will not be adding |
27 |
> new features, and wash my hands of it. I'll be doing a rewrite called |
28 |
> DeviceKit." |
29 |
> |
30 |
> So kudos to the man for recognizing the real problem, admitting it, and moving |
31 |
> onto a real solution. Nothing wrong with making a mistake and fixing it - |
32 |
> that's how we learn. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> Personally, my mistakes teach me MUCH more than my successes - I then know |
35 |
> what not to do :-) |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
That's what I am thinking. At least he knows hardware, how to write a |
40 |
program and sees the big picture of how it turned out. That's why I |
41 |
said I hope this new thing will be better. He sees where it got lost |
42 |
and wants to make it better. Kudos for knowing it is better to start |
43 |
from freaking scratch too. Think Bill Gates could ever do that? ROFL |
44 |
|
45 |
Dale |
46 |
|
47 |
:-) :-) |