1 |
On 01/26/2012 08:55 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote: |
3 |
>> An answer from a different Walter <G>... |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> I also don't use pulse - plain ALSA is good enough for me - but looking |
6 |
>>> over the design goals for pulseaudio I see a decent attempt to deal |
7 |
>>> with audio properly for the future. These days we have computers and |
8 |
>>> devices that can interact with many other things in weird and |
9 |
>>> wonderful ways and software needs to deal with that. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> [...deletia...] |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>>> I just curious why you think that it's not useful to the ordinary |
14 |
>>> user in a generic wide way. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> I'll throw the question back to you. What specific benefits do you |
17 |
>> see? Not just generalities, but real life benfits, please. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Bluetooth headset,configured with two or three clicks of a mouse. And |
20 |
> then reroute the sound of Skype (or whatever app) to the headset while |
21 |
> nice background music still plays on the speakers. |
22 |
|
23 |
Alan, this was what I was thinking when I wrote "useful to everyday ordinary |
24 |
users", though it will never be useful to me. |
25 |
|
26 |
The first thing I do when I hear any sound coming from a new app is do |
27 |
whatever I need to do to make the fscking thing STFU. And talking on |
28 |
the phone with music playing would drive me crazy in seconds. And I |
29 |
would have to strangle any child playing a noisy game and listening to |
30 |
music at the same time. Or even separately. |
31 |
|
32 |
So you can see I'm not the demographic the pulse devs are targeting :) |