Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Hinnerk van Bruinehsen <h.v.bruinehsen@×××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized?
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:48:35
Message-Id: 20130910144824.GA2682@bifrost.fritz.box
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? by Peter Humphrey
1 On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:13:50PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 10 Sep 2013 07:18:11 Dale wrote:
3 > > Peter Humphrey wrote:
4 > > > Is it working for you, Dale? :-)
5 > > So far, so good. I been using unstable, except for the 9999 version,
6 > > for quite a while. Are you saying something is broke and it works for
7 > > me?? O_O Seriously?? This is a joke right??
8 >
9 > No joke, I assure you. As Markos pointed out, a bug has already been opened,
10 > and I fell over it with a vanilla make.conf.
11 >
12 > Unless someone knows of a work-around, I'll stick with the old version of
13 > portage until the bug-fix reaches the stable system.
14 >
15 Try to add -userpriv to your FEATURES (as in FEATURES="-userpriv") in make.conf
16
17 WKR
18 Hinnerk

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Portage 2.2.1 stabilized? Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××××.org>