Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Cc: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ?
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:02:09
Message-Id: 201010222302.26975.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? by Dale
1 Apparently, though unproven, at 22:52 on Friday 22 October 2010, Dale did
2 opine thusly:
3
4 > Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 > > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller
6 > > did
7 > >
8 > > opine thusly:
9 > >> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
10 > >>> ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time,
11 > >>> so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that
12 > >>> when the devs decide to flip a keyword.
13 > >>
14 > >> I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc was IIRC the creation of
15 > >> Roy Marples, who was originally a Gentoo dev and the baselayout
16 > >> maintainer.
17 > >>
18 > >> As Roy developed baselayout 2 (or "baselayout - The Next Generation", as
19 > >> you might call it) he decided to generalise it, AFAICT, in order to make
20 > >> it useful to other distros or unices (e.g. the BSDs).
21 > >>
22 > >> Roy is no longer a Gentoo dev and is no longer maintaining Openrc:
23 > >> http://roy.marples.name/projects/openrc
24 > >>
25 > >> I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question:
26 > >> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce55de133ca592b638db758c9e4573
27 > >> 70. xml or http://tinyurl.com/3xglcqb
28 > >
29 > > Did you and I read the same mail thread? I read all of it - did you?
30 > >
31 > > The end result of that is not that there is a question over openrc, it is
32 > > that openrc will proceed. And anyone else that wants to pursue systemd
33 > > or any other init system is free to go ahead and show up on gentoo-dev
34 > > with running code. Meanwhile, openrc is where it's going.
35 > >
36 > > The thread started with someone wondering about openrc; I disagree with
37 > > your conclusion about where it ended.
38 >
39 > That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming
40 > but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching until it starts getting
41 > closer to that time. It, like some of the newer versions of portage,
42 > appears to be stable and is used by many people but is not marked stable
43 > yet. Both of those sort of confuse me sometimes.
44 >
45 > I'm just hoping that when the switch comes, it is painless.
46
47 Just do it. Seriously.
48
49 There are three blockers holding baselayout-2/openrc back, none of them affect
50 you:
51
52 1. {something rare, I forget}
53 2. Something wierd about evms on weird arches
54 3. Some obscure mdadm thing
55
56 Those are blockers, true enough. But they are *Gentoo* blockers, not *Dale's
57 Gentoo* blockers.
58
59 Seriously, just do it. You'll be glad you did. You'll spend an hour or three
60 double checking lots of stuff in /etc/conf.d/ and then you can reap permanent
61 benefits.
62
63
64 --
65 alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] baselayout --> openrc ? Dean Matzkov <bapabooiee@×××××.com>