1 |
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:52 on Friday 22 October 2010, Dale did |
2 |
opine thusly: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Alan McKinnon wrote: |
5 |
> > Apparently, though unproven, at 18:19 on Friday 22 October 2010, Stroller |
6 |
> > did |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > opine thusly: |
9 |
> >> On 22 Oct 2010, at 12:29, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
10 |
> >>> ... Openrc will be stabilised at some time, |
11 |
> >>> so you may as well do the upgrade when you feel like it rather that |
12 |
> >>> when the devs decide to flip a keyword. |
13 |
> >> |
14 |
> >> I thought this was a matter of debate - Openrc was IIRC the creation of |
15 |
> >> Roy Marples, who was originally a Gentoo dev and the baselayout |
16 |
> >> maintainer. |
17 |
> >> |
18 |
> >> As Roy developed baselayout 2 (or "baselayout - The Next Generation", as |
19 |
> >> you might call it) he decided to generalise it, AFAICT, in order to make |
20 |
> >> it useful to other distros or unices (e.g. the BSDs). |
21 |
> >> |
22 |
> >> Roy is no longer a Gentoo dev and is no longer maintaining Openrc: |
23 |
> >> http://roy.marples.name/projects/openrc |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> >> I understood the future of Openrc within Gentoo to be in question: |
26 |
> >> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce55de133ca592b638db758c9e4573 |
27 |
> >> 70. xml or http://tinyurl.com/3xglcqb |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > Did you and I read the same mail thread? I read all of it - did you? |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > The end result of that is not that there is a question over openrc, it is |
32 |
> > that openrc will proceed. And anyone else that wants to pursue systemd |
33 |
> > or any other init system is free to go ahead and show up on gentoo-dev |
34 |
> > with running code. Meanwhile, openrc is where it's going. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > The thread started with someone wondering about openrc; I disagree with |
37 |
> > your conclusion about where it ended. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> That was what I recalled about the openrc discussion too. It is coming |
40 |
> but just not sure when. Me, I'm not switching until it starts getting |
41 |
> closer to that time. It, like some of the newer versions of portage, |
42 |
> appears to be stable and is used by many people but is not marked stable |
43 |
> yet. Both of those sort of confuse me sometimes. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> I'm just hoping that when the switch comes, it is painless. |
46 |
|
47 |
Just do it. Seriously. |
48 |
|
49 |
There are three blockers holding baselayout-2/openrc back, none of them affect |
50 |
you: |
51 |
|
52 |
1. {something rare, I forget} |
53 |
2. Something wierd about evms on weird arches |
54 |
3. Some obscure mdadm thing |
55 |
|
56 |
Those are blockers, true enough. But they are *Gentoo* blockers, not *Dale's |
57 |
Gentoo* blockers. |
58 |
|
59 |
Seriously, just do it. You'll be glad you did. You'll spend an hour or three |
60 |
double checking lots of stuff in /etc/conf.d/ and then you can reap permanent |
61 |
benefits. |
62 |
|
63 |
|
64 |
-- |
65 |
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |