| 1 |
Hi Walter, can you expand on the LVM2 problem you mention on the MDEV |
| 2 |
page and/or a link if there is one on the status? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
I am building a new desktop (finally building as 64bit!) which will need |
| 5 |
lvm2 and after trying gnome3 for a couple of months on my existing |
| 6 |
machines, I have decided that its too unstable, too much of a resource |
| 7 |
hog and such a major productivity killer so its time to abandon ship. |
| 8 |
If I have to swim, I would like to use the opportunity to drop udev so I |
| 9 |
can avoid that train wreck as well. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
BillK |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 05:52 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: |
| 16 |
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-August/006066.html |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> ======================================================================== |
| 19 |
> Well, we intent to continue to make it possible to run udevd outside of |
| 20 |
> systemd. But that's about it. We will not polish that, or add new |
| 21 |
> features to that or anything. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> OTOH we do polish behaviour of udev when used *within* systemd however, |
| 24 |
> and that's our primary focus. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> And what we will certainly not do is compromise the uniform integration |
| 27 |
> into systemd for some cosmetic improvements for non-systemd systems. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> (Yes, udev on non-systemd systems is in our eyes a dead end, in case you |
| 30 |
> haven't noticed it yet. I am looking forward to the day when we can drop |
| 31 |
> that support entirely.) |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Lennart |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> -- |
| 36 |
> Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. |
| 37 |
> ======================================================================== |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> Plan B... toot... (blowing my own horn) |
| 40 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev |
| 41 |
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Mdev/Automount_USB |
| 42 |
> |
Archives