Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: n952162 <n952162@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] moving /var/tmp/portage
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 23:22:58
Message-Id: 90972cd0-0204-35fe-766e-ab374a14a644@web.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] moving /var/tmp/portage by n952162
1 On 1/5/21 11:46 PM, n952162 wrote:
2 > On 1/5/21 11:38 PM, Michael wrote:
3 >> On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 22:33:44 GMT n952162 wrote:
4 >>> On 1/5/21 11:17 PM, n952162 wrote:
5 >>>> I'm thinking about putting the stuff in /var/tmp/portage on another
6 >>>> drive and linking with a symlink.  Is there a better way?
7 >>> Thank you all for the suggestion about make.conf.  I'd seen something
8 >>> about configuring it in
9 >>>
10 >>> *|/etc/portage/env/notmpfs.conf|*
11 >>>
12 >>> ||and that seemed unfamiliar.
13 >>>
14 >>> *||*
15 >> You could use /etc/portage/env/ to specify various emerge directives
16 >> for a
17 >> particular package, while the rest will be built using the default
18 >> settings.
19 >>
20 >> Setting PORTAGE_TMPDIR in make.conf will define the default directory
21 >> for all
22 >> packages.
23 >>
24 >> What is it you are trying to achieve?
25 >
26 >
27 > Ah, that's the distinction.  Good, thank you.
28 >
29 > I am currently moving all my files to the new location and have updated
30 > make.conf appropriately.
31 >
32 > 80G for a root filesystem is not enough.
33 >
34 >
35
36 (especially when you've got the "noclean" FEATURE set  ;-) )