Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: n952162 <n952162@×××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] moving /var/tmp/portage
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 22:45:50
Message-Id: b1390241-cb1e-aa11-62bb-d9d2107e034f@web.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] moving /var/tmp/portage by Michael
1 On 1/5/21 11:38 PM, Michael wrote:
2 > On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 22:33:44 GMT n952162 wrote:
3 >> On 1/5/21 11:17 PM, n952162 wrote:
4 >>> I'm thinking about putting the stuff in /var/tmp/portage on another
5 >>> drive and linking with a symlink. Is there a better way?
6 >> Thank you all for the suggestion about make.conf. I'd seen something
7 >> about configuring it in
8 >>
9 >> *|/etc/portage/env/notmpfs.conf|*
10 >>
11 >> ||and that seemed unfamiliar.
12 >>
13 >> *||*
14 > You could use /etc/portage/env/ to specify various emerge directives for a
15 > particular package, while the rest will be built using the default settings.
16 >
17 > Setting PORTAGE_TMPDIR in make.conf will define the default directory for all
18 > packages.
19 >
20 > What is it you are trying to achieve?
21
22
23 Ah, that's the distinction.  Good, thank you.
24
25 I am currently moving all my files to the new location and have updated
26 make.conf appropriately.
27
28 80G for a root filesystem is not enough.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] moving /var/tmp/portage n952162 <n952162@×××.de>