1 |
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 02:10 +0100, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: |
2 |
> > hmm, shorewall must have done something that's more persistent. |
3 |
... |
4 |
> > Well, these idea's are really stabbing in the dark, but you gotta start |
5 |
> > somewhere! |
6 |
> |
7 |
> thanks for your hints, i checked all these things but there seems |
8 |
> nothing of shorewall remainig! i am quite sure cause i am using a |
9 |
> cruft script which searches for files remaining after an uninstall. |
10 |
> The scriptt does its job there were several files from shorewall |
11 |
> remaining, but now they are all gone but my problem still remains. |
12 |
|
13 |
ah yes, I recall the cruft script! Does it exclude any directories? |
14 |
|
15 |
If there is nothing shorewall related left, then the only explanation is |
16 |
that shorewall must have edited an existing file somewhere... which |
17 |
seems strange... hal? udev? who knows! |
18 |
|
19 |
The only last thing I could suggest is running lsof to see what files |
20 |
are being accessed when you start the net.eth1 script. |
21 |
|
22 |
Other than that, I'm out of ideas, sorry! |
23 |
-- |
24 |
Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au> |
25 |
|
26 |
Nothing motivates a man more than to see his boss put in an honest day's work. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |