1 |
Bill Kenworthy wrote: |
2 |
> On 28/04/16 01:33, Dale wrote: |
3 |
>> Michael Mol wrote: |
4 |
>>> I have my system automatically update nightly, and check the build results in |
5 |
>>> the morning. If there's a persistent build error for a couple days, I file a |
6 |
>>> bug report. That's my threshold, anyway. |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> This started on Sunday. So it has met that part anyway. Since I run a |
10 |
>> mix of stable and unstable, it has been known to cause issues that are |
11 |
>> weird. I just don't want to file a bug report and take up a devs time |
12 |
>> if it is some weird one off thing that affects no one else. It's not |
13 |
>> like they don't have enough stuff to deal with already. Then again, |
14 |
>> they do want info on failures so that it doesn't affect others. Where's |
15 |
>> my coin to flip? lol |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I plan to sync again and if it persists, Raid comes out. :/ |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> Thanks. |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> Dale |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> :-) :-) |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> I have a couple of background "things" happening at the moment: |
26 |
> |
27 |
> prelink and glibc: odd failures that make no sense - unprelink the |
28 |
> system and everything works fine (at some point you get a failure to |
29 |
> fork.) I hit it when trying to build multiple lxc instances ... it |
30 |
> builds two and then the server becomes "toast" :( There is a bug on bgo ... |
31 |
> |
32 |
> btrfs and kernels 4.4.6 and 4.4.7: fails to convert/balance a raid 10 |
33 |
> (system hard lock, no errors) and maybe some file system related build |
34 |
> errors (which might also be glibc related, though it might not ...) |
35 |
> 4.4.8 works fine (includes a number of btrfs fixes) |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Either of those fit? |
38 |
> |
39 |
> BillK |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
> |
43 |
|
44 |
|
45 |
Oddly, I had some google hits to that effect. I can't recall exactly |
46 |
what I was searching for but on one of them, I did see glibc mentioned |
47 |
as the issue. I just figured it would fail on other packages as well if |
48 |
it was the problem so thought it unrelated. Well, maybe it is after |
49 |
all. I dunno. Good question. |
50 |
|
51 |
I seem to recall glibc being one of those packages that you can't |
52 |
downgrade. Sort of chicken to upgrade, just in case the problem gets |
53 |
even worse. Here's a little more info on my system. |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
root@fireball / # uname -r |
57 |
3.18.7-gentoo |
58 |
root@fireball / # equery list -p glibc |
59 |
* Searching for glibc ... |
60 |
[-P-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.17:2.2 |
61 |
[-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.18-r1:2.2 |
62 |
[-P-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.19-r1:2.2 |
63 |
[-P-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.20-r2:2.2 |
64 |
[-P-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.21-r2:2.2 |
65 |
[IP-] [ ] sys-libs/glibc-2.22-r4:2.2 |
66 |
[-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r1:2.2 |
67 |
[-P-] [ ~] sys-libs/glibc-2.23-r2:2.2 |
68 |
[-P-] [ -] sys-libs/glibc-9999:2.2 |
69 |
root@fireball / # |
70 |
|
71 |
|
72 |
Yea, I'm using a old kernel. I haven't rebooted in a while now. I just |
73 |
wonder what that glibc 2.23-r2 would be like?? Anyone here took a drive |
74 |
around the block with that version? |
75 |
|
76 |
I just synced again. Going to see if anything changes or not but I |
77 |
doubt it will. I didn't see any changes to the qtwebkit ebuild. |
78 |
|
79 |
Dale |
80 |
|
81 |
:-) :-) |