1 |
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 16:31 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 15 March 2008, Daniel Iliev wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 15:35:32 +0200 |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Saturday 15 March 2008, Chris Brennan wrote: |
7 |
> > > > Dale wrote: |
8 |
> > > > | Chris Brennan wrote: |
9 |
> > > > |> How come I don't see my own posts to this list? |
10 |
> > > > | |
11 |
> > > > | We got this one. I saw one other one too. |
12 |
> > > > | Dale |
13 |
> > > > | |
14 |
> > > > | :-) :-) |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > > Ya but you didn't answer my question :D |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > The list software doesn't send a copy of a mail back to the same |
19 |
> > > address as what sent it. This is pretty usual behaviour for any |
20 |
> > > list run by a non-idiot (like this one) |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Is that so? Then will you, please, explain how do people get their |
23 |
> > original messages back? |
24 |
> |
25 |
> There's a copy already in their outbox? And a sane mailer (like say |
26 |
> kmail) will have put the sent copy there already. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> -- |
29 |
> Alan McKinnon |
30 |
> alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
I doubt it works that way. I always get mails back from the list, I can |
34 |
forward one to you, the headers should be proof enough. Of course it's |
35 |
possible to place a copy of your sent message in your inbox (and I know, |
36 |
kmail's got an option for that) but that's not standard behavior. It's |
37 |
merely a workaround for broken filters like gmail's. |