1 |
> > My unattended daily system maintenance procedure is like this: |
2 |
> > |
3 |
> > layman -S |
4 |
> > emerge --sync |
5 |
> > emerge -pvDuN world |
6 |
> > emerge -pv --depclean |
7 |
> > eclean -p distfiles |
8 |
> > eclean -p packages |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > And then attended like this: |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > emerge -DuN world |
13 |
> > revdep-rebuild |
14 |
> > etc-update |
15 |
> > elogv |
16 |
> > emerge --depclean |
17 |
> > eclean distfiles |
18 |
> > eclean packages |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Am I missing any good stuff? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > - Grant |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> I would use the -a option unless the output of the first part is being |
26 |
> emailed to you or something. |
27 |
|
28 |
Exactly, it's being emailed to me and I should have said so. |
29 |
|
30 |
> Other than using -a instead of -p, I don't see anything missing. Just |
31 |
> check the USE flags before letting it update. They get changed |
32 |
> sometimes and it could cause issues. Sometimes the change is for the |
33 |
> good so always look into it first. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> You *may* want to look into dispatch-conf too. It does the same as |
36 |
> etc-update but it keeps records in case a updated config file borks your |
37 |
> system. Just a thought. |
38 |
|
39 |
I will do that. dispatch-conf sounds like a good thing. |
40 |
|
41 |
- Grant |