| 1 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0600, Dale wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Putting /usr on LVM is not the problem. I have had /usr on LVM for a |
| 4 |
> good long while now. It has booted just fine. The new udev is what is |
| 5 |
> going to break it, whether I use LVM or not from what has been said on |
| 6 |
> this list and elsewhere. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I've been running separate /usr on LVM with ~arch udev and no initramfs |
| 9 |
on a couple of systems with no problems. The news item is taking the easy |
| 10 |
way out by saying "it will break" rather than "it may break" - such |
| 11 |
breakage is by no means certain - although the future holds no |
| 12 |
guarantees. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
We never really grow up; we only learn how to act in public. |
Archives