1 |
2008/6/7, Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@×××××.de>: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> * Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > > Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the third |
6 |
> > > item of output. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> >Ah, cool. That helps a lot :) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > > > then map |
11 |
> > > > the upstream's versioning schemes to my normalized one. |
12 |
> > > > *If* Gentoo strictly follows the upstream's versioning scheme |
13 |
> > > and only adds some -r* for ebuild revisions, then the first step |
14 |
> > > should be easy, |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > >Gentoo follows upstream as closely as possible, but not when their |
17 |
> > >versioning breaks the Gentoo rules. For example, dovecot-1.1.rc8 |
18 |
> > >becomes dovecot-1.1_rc8. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> > Are there any formal rules for that ? |
21 |
> |
22 |
> I believe you can find the naming rules here: |
23 |
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2&chap=1#doc_chap2 |
24 |
> cu |
25 |
> -- |
26 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
27 |
> Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
28 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
29 |
> Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
30 |
> http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
31 |
> Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
32 |
> http://patches.metux.de/ |
33 |
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- |
34 |
> -- |
35 |
> gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Espen |