| 1 |
* Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Try atom, from portage-utils, then use cut or awk to select the third |
| 4 |
> item of output. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Ah, cool. That helps a lot :) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > then map |
| 9 |
> > the upstream's versioning schemes to my normalized one. |
| 10 |
> > *If* Gentoo strictly follows the upstream's versioning scheme |
| 11 |
> > and only adds some -r* for ebuild revisions, then the first step |
| 12 |
> > should be easy, |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Gentoo follows upstream as closely as possible, but not when their |
| 15 |
> versioning breaks the Gentoo rules. For example, dovecot-1.1.rc8 |
| 16 |
> becomes dovecot-1.1_rc8. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Are there any formal rules for that ? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
cu |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 24 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 25 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 26 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 27 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 28 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 29 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 30 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives