1 |
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 05:53:56PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
2 |
> Apparently, though unproven, at 16:37 on Saturday 14 May 2011, Indi did opine |
3 |
> thusly: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > True, just be aware that if you enable gtk *globally* you will end up |
7 |
> > building the gtk interface for absolutely everything which has that |
8 |
> > option. |
9 |
> > Far better (IMO, YMMV) is to use /etc/portage/package.use specify such |
10 |
> > things per package. Unless, of course, you like having a gtk GUI for |
11 |
> > everything. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > :) |
14 |
> |
15 |
> No, it is much better to enable such a flag globally and *disable* it using |
16 |
> package.use where you do *not* want it. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Personally, I have better things to do than examine every new or changed |
19 |
> package that shows up after avuND world and edit package.us for every single |
20 |
> flag in that huge list. |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Sounds like the old "6 of one, a half-dozen of the other" to me... |
24 |
What makes the subtractive method better? |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
caveat utilitor |
28 |
♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ |