Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Iain Buchanan <iaindb@××××××××××××.au>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead?
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 02:13:11
Message-Id: 1200276755.12613.36.camel@orpheus
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? by Alan McKinnon
1 On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 11:22 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
2 > On Friday 11 January 2008, Shaochun Wang wrote:
3 > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:58:16AM +0100, Pongracz Istvan wrote:
4 > > > 2008. 01. 11, p茅ntek keltez茅ssel 09.37-kor Daniel Pielmeier ezt
5 > > > 铆rta: <joke>
6 > > >
7 > > > Or they will change to GYN (Gentoo Yearly Newsletter)
8 > > >
9 > > > :)
10 > > >
11 > > > </joke>
12 > >
13 > > Maybe you joke will become the truth. Currently, Gentoo has not
14 > > updated its installation CD for a long time!
15 >
16 > Why do you think gentoo *needs* to update it's install CD?
17
18 The official release is an indication of the life of a distribution or
19 package. Look at one of Keith Packard's reasons for leaving Xfree86
20 (slow release cycle), or Gnome's recent push to speed their release
21 cycle.
22
23 I know that I can still use the latest install CD, and do an update.
24 However, the install CD is only one indication of Gentoo's problems.
25 The out of date website, the newsletter releases, the sad responses to
26 the "how are we doing" question on gentoo-dev... Anyway I digress...
27
28 --
29 Iain Buchanan <iaindb at netspace dot net dot au>
30
31 Real computer scientists like having a computer on their desk, else how
32 could they read their mail?
33
34 --
35 gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Is GWN dead? Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>