1 |
Chuck Robey wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
[snip] |
4 |
|
5 |
> Mark, I could be responsible for this (the fact that it seems that neither |
6 |
> of the things I really wanted to know are covered) because sometimes I am |
7 |
> not clear in what I'm asking, so let me try again. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I need to get an up-to-date version of eclipse working on my gentoo box. |
10 |
> First question is, is there a Galileo (3.5+) version of eclipse available |
11 |
> as a portage |
12 |
> package? I can't find it, so I'd really appreciate a pointer. The only |
13 |
> thing I can see is a fairly old eclipse version (I think a year or more |
14 |
> out of date). |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Second question, at the eclipse website, I see a binary version of the |
17 |
> latest |
18 |
> Linux-eclipse (the version I'm after). If I *can't* get a portage package |
19 |
> version of Galileo-eclipse, then if I install the binary package |
20 |
> (non-portage) from the eclipse website, can I get (and how can I get) |
21 |
> portage to consider this package as supplying any dependency which would |
22 |
> be otherwise supplied by the latest (ganymede, 3.4+) portage version of |
23 |
> the eclipse tool . |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Unless I'm completely misreading your stuff, your examples tell me how to |
26 |
> install the (too old) portage version, which is in all cases just too old |
27 |
> for me, so my 2 questions boil down to (1) must I?, and (2) How do I? |
28 |
|
29 |
The binary is self-contained, simply install it in /opt and you're done. As |
30 |
long as you have X running, it's enough and you don't need to tell portage |
31 |
anything about it. |
32 |
|
33 |
- Jörg |