Archives
Archives
| From: | Joshua D Doll <joshua.doll@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical) | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:51:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 499115DE.4040900@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical) by Saphirus Sage |
||
| 1 | Saphirus Sage wrote: |
| 2 | > Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | >> http://video.linuxfoundation.org/video/1069 |
| 5 | >> |
| 6 | >> I found it quite interesting that even Gentoo beat Canonical in the |
| 7 | >> amount of patches contributed upstream... |
| 8 | >> |
| 9 | >> |
| 10 | >> |
| 11 | > Good find, I actually didn't know about E-Trade using Gentoo servers. I |
| 12 | > don't think it should be too surprising that Gentoo would contribute |
| 13 | > more patches than Conical, as until today, I'd only actually heard of |
| 14 | > one of them. |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | > |
| 17 | > |
| 18 | This video brought up an interesting question by my friend (an ubuntu |
| 19 | user). How would one go about getting Canonical or the ubuntu community |
| 20 | to change their practice of not contributing fixes back upstream? |
| 21 | Without having to change distributions. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | --Joshua Doll |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical) | Emil Jensen <lister.lists@×××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-user] The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical) | Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> |
| [gentoo-user] Re: The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to Gentoo vs Canonical) | Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@×××××××.net> |