| 1 |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:47:37 -0700 |
| 2 |
Grant <emailgrant@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > > > I recognize everything in 'ps -ef' I think, but I've never |
| 5 |
> > > > really used netstat before. Under "Active Internet |
| 6 |
> > > > connections" I don't recognize: |
| 7 |
> > > > |
| 8 |
> > > > tcp localhost:10030 |
| 9 |
> > > > tcp *:snpp |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Also, snpp is for pagers: |
| 12 |
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Network_Paging_Protocol |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > With netstat -lp it looks like *:snpp is associated with apache2 and |
| 15 |
> > is using the same pid as *:http and *:https. I've never set up |
| 16 |
> > anything having to do with a pager. I've never had a pager. What |
| 17 |
> > can I do to investigate that further? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> This snpp pager thing is the weirdest thing I've found. It sounds |
| 20 |
> like the kind of thing I would know if I set up. Someone has some |
| 21 |
> kind of pager alert installed on my system? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> - Grant |
| 24 |
http://www.qpage.org/rfc1861.html |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Network Working Group |
| 27 |
Request for Comments: 1861 |
| 28 |
October 1995 |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
... |
| 31 |
...1. Introduction With all due apologies to the Glenayre engineers (who |
| 32 |
take offense at the term "nerd") beepers are as much a part of computer |
| 33 |
nerdom as X- terminals--perhaps, unfortunately, more. The intent of |
| 34 |
Simple Network Paging Protocol is to provide a standard whereby pages |
| 35 |
can be delivered to individual paging terminals... |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
I thought that was amusing. Now I think the question is, if apache is |
| 38 |
really serving that, isn't something going to show up in the logs |
| 39 |
maybe? |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
and BTw, have you done an external portmap? |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives