Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Adobe flash warning and tree
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:31:55
Message-Id: 5692E9DE.2090003@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: Adobe flash warning and tree by "»Q«"
1 »Q« wrote:
2 > On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:47:47 -0600
3 > Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >> Correct me if I'm wrong here. Isn't flash supposed to be dying
6 >> anyway? Why are so many sites still using it if they should be using
7 >> HTML5? Isn't HTML5 supposed to eliminate flash??
8 > It's been *supposed* to be dying for years, and HTML5 video was hoped
9 > to be the silver bullet that would finish it off. Mozilla certainly
10 > wants it dead, and IIRC even Google and Adobe have paid lip service to
11 > killing it off. Unfortunately (IMO, natch) Mozilla no longer has the
12 > market share to drive things, and (IMO again) Google doesn't have the
13 > will to deal with it, despite having taken steps such as using HTML5
14 > on YouTube. Mozilla recently announced deprecation of all NPAPI
15 > plugins -- except Flash, because people whose news/sports/porn videos
16 > stopped working would just switch to Chrome.
17 >
18 > I think we have to look to the big social media companies and to
19 > Google for hope, which is kinda sad. Facebook has recently completed
20 > their transition to using HTM5 video. Twitter's Periscope still uses
21 > Flash. I don't know what critical mass of sites will get Google to
22 > drop Flash support, but I think that's the only way it will eventually
23 > happen.
24 >
25 > AFAIK, with all major browsers supporting HTML5 video, the only reason
26 > so many sites still require Flash is that it costs money to transition.
27
28 Crap, it sounds like the buggy has one horse in front and one in the
29 back. No matter how you look at it, they still pushing the buggy. Yes,
30 the horse in the front is actually pushing because of the way the
31 harness is made. Saw that on TV once ages ago. Weird tho.
32
33
34 >> I thought Yahoo switched a good while back. I know I went in and
35 >> changed it to use HTML5 but it still gripes when I go there about
36 >> flash being a problem. Odd.
37 > I dunno, I don't use Yahoo much. The griping might be because Yahoo is
38 > embedding Flash from other sites -- I know they do from nfl.com, at
39 > least, because I was watching highlights there yesterday.
40
41
42 Well, I tested a theory. I removed flash. I then went to youtube and
43 guess what, the video played fine. So, Youtube is ready for HTML5 it
44 seems but defaults to flash it would seem. Why not the other way around
45 I wonder???? Oh, auto-play was back again too. Grrrrrr!! lol
46
47
48 >> I have a weather site that I use and as far as I know, it is flash
49 >> only. Of course, it is a Govt run site so they will likely be the
50 >> very last ones to switch over to the new and improved way too. :/
51 > Heh, I just found that NOAAH offers looping radar imagery via Java,
52 > Flash, HTML5, and animated GIFs. Talk about the Department of
53 > Redundancy Department. <http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/imagery/eaus.html>
54
55 I use a different site, will look into yours in a minute tho. I just
56 picked a random radar for a example.
57
58 http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/radar.php?rid=GLD&product=NCR&overlay=11101111&loop=yes
59
60
61 No flash, no worky. :-(
62
63 >> I'm planning to do my regular updates shortly. Maybe something new
64 >> will be in the tree by then, I hope anyway. One good thing about it,
65 >> it makes Yahoo not auto-play any more. ;-)
66 > :-) That's one of the big arguments in favor of open tech on the web,
67 > that it gives users more control of their experiences. I don't know of
68 > a way to prevent Flash autoplay short of something like FlashBlock.
69 >
70 >
71 >
72
73 Well, I do. Just use a version of flash with a security problem. Just
74 saying. ROFL
75
76 At least it isn't supposed to rain for a week or so. I can't go without
77 that site for a little bit anyway.
78
79 Dale
80
81 :-) :-)