Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 18:42:15
Message-Id: 52E556F0.3040908@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably by Alan McKinnon
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 01/26/2014 07:30 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
5 > On 26/01/2014 20:04, hasufell wrote:
6 >> So, not sure where your optimism comes from.
7 >
8 >
9 > It comes from watching what happens at the end of running emerge,
10 > don't read any more into it than that. Especially not optimism, I
11 > think you might be projecting your own frustrations.
12
13 That might be true. Mixing stable and unstable has become more and
14 more difficult these days.
15 Starting with USE="-*" on a server (which is a sane thing to do) has
16 become a lot more difficult as well.
17
18 >
19 > A couple of years ago I used to have to manually resolve blockers
20 > about one world update in two. It started becoming a huge PITA
21 > especially as the deps are usually easy to solve - if I can look at
22 > the screen for a few seconds and figure it out, then software can
23 > do the same in milliseconds. Recent portages now do this properly
24 > when viewed from a results-only perspective.
25 >
26 > On my machines, that is what I see happening. That is the ONLY set
27 > of FACTS I have to work on; you may have more.
28 >
29 > I'm willing to give up 4 minutes while emerge runs so I don't have
30 > to spend many more minutes right afterwards doing manually the very
31 > shit that software is very good at. Whether portage is a complete
32 > pile of dogshit software or not is beside the point. Even if it is,
33 > my 4 minutes still buys me lots <shrug>
34 >
35 >
36 >
37
38 My pessimism comes from the fact that I wasn't able to communicate to
39 any1 in real life that gentoo and especially portage have a positive
40 usability score. Especially to those who have tried it once. As
41 someone who knows the internals and doesn't read portage messages
42 about conflicts anymore, but digs into the ebuilds directly... I don't
43 have a lot of severe problems to maintain any gentoo system. But it is
44 sad that you need those skills.
45
46 Usually I tell people to use a desktop profile, never to use
47 autounmask, not to mix stable and unstable branch and not to play too
48 much with per-package useflags unless you are really missing something.
49
50 Portage does alienate new users a lot. These performance issues add to
51 that.
52 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
53 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
54 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
55
56 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS5VbwAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWz5NAH/i5viXuWexvbLgVRefuDWCFo
57 gmLekzmBpEQqvozdxXac1VNFHPWmmY8KVTkTe+JbtgGblzHsiQOug6n47Mpga+dt
58 tn7f60dLDrTBBpvahVADln9pha3OjtmKDI/JXGV1nZQbFFRBW0x01K6absoFYNs3
59 bdylCzcG5ZUOCKvBqVzpS8pKVeuBtrItadSOpJTDj6CQys2Q1RVQAl3aIIX96nAx
60 IcN8eyBeuhQbjACKOfUSgIV/q8XwLdzUHLu//SxJ4psMKL5ne/EQaph9aRI+si2h
61 bOP9MkKt/QTmj0dGSpbR5DJt6r0tlsmIa1ZIS/DnC7vbKvXVRESUn2tMDes9NEM=
62 =Hl9N
63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage performance dropped considerably William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>