1 |
On 26/01/2014 20:04, hasufell wrote: |
2 |
> So, not sure where your optimism comes from. |
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
It comes from watching what happens at the end of running emerge, don't |
6 |
read any more into it than that. Especially not optimism, I think you |
7 |
might be projecting your own frustrations. |
8 |
|
9 |
A couple of years ago I used to have to manually resolve blockers about |
10 |
one world update in two. It started becoming a huge PITA especially as |
11 |
the deps are usually easy to solve - if I can look at the screen for a |
12 |
few seconds and figure it out, then software can do the same in |
13 |
milliseconds. Recent portages now do this properly when viewed from a |
14 |
results-only perspective. |
15 |
|
16 |
On my machines, that is what I see happening. That is the ONLY set of |
17 |
FACTS I have to work on; you may have more. |
18 |
|
19 |
I'm willing to give up 4 minutes while emerge runs so I don't have to |
20 |
spend many more minutes right afterwards doing manually the very shit |
21 |
that software is very good at. Whether portage is a complete pile of |
22 |
dogshit software or not is beside the point. Even if it is, my 4 minutes |
23 |
still buys me lots <shrug> |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Alan McKinnon |
29 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |