1 |
On 26/04/19 18:00, Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
>> On 2019-04-22, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>>> On the question of ethernet. [...] Do I plug the printer into the |
6 |
>>> router or do I have to connect it to the puter itself? I think I |
7 |
>>> read somewhere ages ago, on this list most likely, that you plug it |
8 |
>>> into the router. |
9 |
>> Yes, that's how it's usually done. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>>> That way all puters hooked to the router can access it. |
12 |
>> Exactly. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Picking last reply. I got the printer, removed all the shipping stuff, |
17 |
> did the normal setup and got a test page printed from CUPS, in color. |
18 |
> I'm taking this from the CUPS printer page that shows the connection. |
19 |
> It printed from Kwrite and shows as ready for other programs as well. I |
20 |
> would like someone to confirm that this is the best way to have this set |
21 |
> up. I googled and can't find a howto for this. Most everything I found |
22 |
> referenced .rpm and .deb stuff. |
23 |
> |
24 |
Picking the last reply :-) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> The only way I could find to print is using the ipp thingy, at least it |
28 |
> was the first way I could print successfully. Still, is this the proper |
29 |
> way? |
30 |
|
31 |
I believe ipp stands for "Internet Printing Protocol", so although I |
32 |
might still call it "plug and pRay", I think that is the new modern |
33 |
standard. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Oh, it is connected by ethernet to my router. I figured I would use |
36 |
> that from the start since I may end up putting my printer in another |
37 |
> room which would require a longer cable. |
38 |
> |
39 |
Good call. All my printers are networked. They run (or used to) a small |
40 |
lpd server in firmware, so in effect they are a "small computer plus |
41 |
locally attached printer" on your network. |
42 |
|
43 |
> Only printed the test pages but they look neato!!! I hope to give this |
44 |
> thing a test drive once I know it is set up correctly. |
45 |
> |
46 |
> Thanks to all for the help. This may be the best printer I've ever |
47 |
> had. :-D |
48 |
> |
49 |
Just don't expect it to last as long as you hope ... there was a thread |
50 |
somewhere recently where they were discussing long-lived printers, and |
51 |
it was noticeable that there were almost NO printers mentioned between |
52 |
about 5 and 10 years old mentioned. Old printers are tanks that go on |
53 |
and on. New ones seem to just about outlast the extended warranty and |
54 |
then die. |
55 |
|
56 |
Covering the same sort of topics as everyone else, but ... inks. A lot |
57 |
of modern ink-jet inks are permanent once dried, so they no longer run |
58 |
like they once did. They also don't dry up in the cartridge like they |
59 |
once did. That doesn't stop them being more expensive than vintage |
60 |
champagne! But I would NOT refill toner cartridges myself - buy |
61 |
remanufactured ones. Toner is nasty stuff. Think of it as wax - it's |
62 |
stuck electrostatically to the paper then melted on. If you spill it it |
63 |
makes one heck of a mess - wipe it up with tissue paper and then clean |
64 |
it down with COLD water. If you wash your hands in hot water it will |
65 |
print onto them ... :-) |
66 |
|
67 |
Cost - I found a cheap laser printer for £50. I think I did the maths |
68 |
and worked out that even if you threw it in the bin after using up the |
69 |
starter cartridge, it was cheaper than an equivalent ink-jet! Bear in |
70 |
mind that your typical ink-jet cartridge struggles to do a pack (ream) |
71 |
of paper, your typical (nowadays) laser cartridge does about a box of |
72 |
paper. And unfortunately, yes, if you want photos then use an ink-jet. |
73 |
And use the expensive manufacturer inks and paper too ... |
74 |
|
75 |
Brother printers - that's what my mum uses mostly ... |
76 |
|
77 |
Usage - a laser should be fine up to a box of paper a month. Sounds like |
78 |
you'll be nowhere near that. Just try not to go mad - a boss of mine |
79 |
years ago looked at the "X pages per annum" figure for some - they were |
80 |
dot-matrix back then - printers we had and said "why are they always |
81 |
breaking, we don't do that many pages". I said in response "yep, we |
82 |
don't do that many per year, but we do do near enough the entire year's |
83 |
allowance over two months!" If you stay under one pack of paper every |
84 |
two to three days you'll be fine. |
85 |
|
86 |
I've always bought "buy X cartridges and get a free printer" jobs |
87 |
before, but having recently binned a broken printer along with far too |
88 |
many spare cartridges, I've changed tack. I had a b&w duplex printer, |
89 |
along with a colour printer/scanner, and I've now replaced both with a |
90 |
powerful little workstation, a M477fdn. Laser colour, duplex print, |
91 |
duplex scan. The starter cartridges have lasted about six months, |
92 |
including two newsletter print runs (which paid for a new high-capacity |
93 |
b&w cartridge). I now need to replace the colour cartridges, but seeing |
94 |
as HP offer a free 3-year warranty provided you only use HP cartridges, |
95 |
I'm going to fork out for them. That *should* see out the warranty, and |
96 |
at £300 for the printer and £400 for a fresh set of cartridges, that's |
97 |
not too bad for three years. Once the warranty's gone, I'll use |
98 |
compatibles, and if the printer breaks I'll have saved enough for a new one. |
99 |
|
100 |
Laser printers cost up front, but once I've paid for this set of |
101 |
cartridges I'm probably set up for a couple of years. Just don't expect |
102 |
modern lasers to go on and on, and budget to replace it ... :-) |
103 |
|
104 |
Cheers, |
105 |
Wol |