| 1 |
On Mi, 26 Apr 04:55:46 +0200 |
| 2 |
tuxic@××××××.de wrote: |
| 3 |
>I tried xfce4-terminal as suggested by Floyd...and got exactly the |
| 4 |
>reversed timings. He found xfce4-terminal six times faster than |
| 5 |
>urxvt and I got the reversed result. |
| 6 |
See my previous response for this. |
| 7 |
>If I could find the culprit on my box I would be happy with sakura |
| 8 |
>and/or xfve4-terminal. |
| 9 |
>Where can I start? |
| 10 |
>What may be the reasons? |
| 11 |
Just to clarify, I doesn’t suggest you to install/use xfce4-terminal. |
| 12 |
It was only used as a reference by and for me. But since you could be |
| 13 |
happy with xfce4-terminal, try to find out the reasons by: |
| 14 |
- selecting a bitmap font |
| 15 |
- turn off anti-aliasing |
| 16 |
- turn off fancy visual/graphical stuff |
| 17 |
- decrease the terminal size |
| 18 |
for example and look if it hopefully makes any differences so you get a |
| 19 |
basis for your next decision(s). :-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Regards, |
| 23 |
floyd |
Archives