Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Joost Roeleveld <joost@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable?
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:49:49
Message-Id: 4562529.VSJyiXps7N@eve
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? by Dale
1 On Wednesday, August 10, 2011 01:09:53 PM Dale wrote:
2 > Dale wrote:
3 > > I did upgrade it a while back. I'll check and see if there is a new
4 > > one now. I hadn't thought of that before. We all know that a update
5 > > fixes some bugs but introduces several new ones. lol Reminds me of
6 > > Raid. Kill some but new babies come out a few days later. New bugs
7 > > but still problems. :/
8 > >
9 > > Thanks much. Great hunch.
10 > >
11 > > Dale
12 > >
13 > > :-) :-)
14 >
15 > OK. Here is a linky:
16 >
17 > http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx?pid=3320&dl=1#bios
18 >
19 > There is a update but I don't think it is something I should need. It
20 > has a brief description of what is changed. Does anyone think I should
21 > update this anyway? They always say not to upgrade unless it is going
22 > to fix something since it can break things. I'm on F4 now by the way.
23 > The F5A would be the new one.
24 >
25 > Thoughts? Yeps or nopes would be great. Alan, Neil and other gurus.
26 >
27 > Dale
28 >
29 > :-) :-)
30
31 Comment 2 "Update CPU AGESA code" might help. You'd need to google for what
32 AGESA means. (Not done this yet)
33 Comment 1, however, "Beta BIOS" makes me think you might not want to try it.
34 Beta is generally, testing, it might break things.
35
36 Am surprised they put a Beta up though.
37
38 --
39 Joost

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? Thanasis <thanasis@××××××××××.org>