1 |
Yes. 'deep' is exactly what I expect -D to do. My incancation is the same as |
2 |
it's been for years, its' that -D acts more like a -u now. |
3 |
|
4 |
DÆVID |
5 |
|
6 |
> -----Original Message----- |
7 |
> From: Wolfgang Illmeyer [mailto:wolfgang.illmeyer@×××.net] |
8 |
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 3:53 PM |
9 |
> To: gentoo-user@l.g.o |
10 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -D pulling in more than it |
11 |
> should these days?! |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Am Donnerstag, 28. September 2006 23:15 schrieb Daevid Vincent: |
14 |
> > Something has changed recently with 'emerge'. Whenever I |
15 |
> use the -D option, |
16 |
> > which I am pretty much in the habbit of typing 'emerge |
17 |
> -Dav' or 'emerge |
18 |
> > -Davu world/system', I notice it pulling in more stuff than |
19 |
> it should. It |
20 |
> > never acted like this before. It's only been within the |
21 |
> past few weeks. On |
22 |
> > an older Gentoo server (which I don't upgrade nearly as often as my |
23 |
> > notebook above) it doesn't exhibit this behaviour. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> This seems to be an unlucky change of the semantics of -D. If |
26 |
> I remember |
27 |
> correctly, -D usually meant "do not downgrade". This option |
28 |
> however has long |
29 |
> been deprecated because it was responsible for lots of |
30 |
> troubles and was |
31 |
> removed recently. man emerge now says: |
32 |
> |
33 |
> --deep (-D) |
34 |
> When used in conjunction with --update, this flag |
35 |
> forces emerge |
36 |
> to consider the entire dependency tree of packages, |
37 |
> instead of |
38 |
> checking only the immediate dependencies of the |
39 |
> packages. As an |
40 |
> example, this catches updates in libraries that are |
41 |
> not directly |
42 |
> listed in the dependencies of a package. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> /Wolfgang |
45 |
> -- |
46 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
47 |
> |
48 |
> |
49 |
|
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |