Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Mark Pariente <markpariente@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the big gnome-3.8 update
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:28:34
Message-Id: 1375086499.28356.2.camel@siegeengine
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the big gnome-3.8 update by "Canek Peláez Valdés"
1 On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 11:16 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
2 > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Michael Hampicke <mh@××××.biz> wrote:
3 > > Am 28.07.2013 10:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
4 > >> Am 28.07.2013 10:04, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
5 > >>
6 > >>> The only "special" thing I'm doing is to mask >sys-apps/systemd-204,
7 > >>> since 205 introduced the new cgroups management code (with systemd as
8 > >>> the only writer of the cgroups hierarchy), and it seems to cause some
9 > >>> minor problems with logind. Other than that, it works withouth a
10 > >>> glitch: gnome-base/gnome-3.8.0, sys-apps/systemd-204, no consolekit at
11 > >>> all.
12 > >>
13 > >> Same here, yes. I run systemd-206 but I didn't notice an problem(s) yet.
14 > >> Maybe there are some and I don't get it ;-)
15 > >>
16 > >
17 > > I had one problem, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd > 204,
18 > > the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all.
19 > >
20 > > But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not
21 > > be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw------ root:root
22 > >
23 > > Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not
24 > > exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on
25 > > gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root?
26 >
27 > My problem was that *sometimes* (not always) I was unable to unlock my
28 > session after suspending my laptop or desktop. Reverting back to
29 > systemd-204 solved it, so I'm assuming that's the problem, although I
30 > didn't really investigated the issue.
31
32 This turned out to be an upstream issue. See:
33
34 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67267
35
36 and the corresponding Gentoo bug:
37
38 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=477954
39
40 Upstream has already fixed it on git, so we'll either have to wait until
41 systemd-207 or see if the systemd maintainers cherry pick the patch as
42 206-r1 on portage.
43
44 --Mark

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the big gnome-3.8 update "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>