Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the big gnome-3.8 update
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:03:45
Message-Id: CADPrc82dAWL1m4byAHSLWrAWmWNT6L1hJ_J1rRtEgr5pmdGEYg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the big gnome-3.8 update by Mark Pariente
1 On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Mark Pariente <markpariente@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 11:16 -0500, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
3 >> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Michael Hampicke <mh@××××.biz> wrote:
4 >> > Am 28.07.2013 10:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
5 >> >> Am 28.07.2013 10:04, schrieb Canek Peláez Valdés:
6 >> >>
7 >> >>> The only "special" thing I'm doing is to mask >sys-apps/systemd-204,
8 >> >>> since 205 introduced the new cgroups management code (with systemd as
9 >> >>> the only writer of the cgroups hierarchy), and it seems to cause some
10 >> >>> minor problems with logind. Other than that, it works withouth a
11 >> >>> glitch: gnome-base/gnome-3.8.0, sys-apps/systemd-204, no consolekit at
12 >> >>> all.
13 >> >>
14 >> >> Same here, yes. I run systemd-206 but I didn't notice an problem(s) yet.
15 >> >> Maybe there are some and I don't get it ;-)
16 >> >>
17 >> >
18 >> > I had one problem, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd > 204,
19 >> > the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all.
20 >> >
21 >> > But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not
22 >> > be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw------ root:root
23 >> >
24 >> > Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not
25 >> > exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on
26 >> > gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root?
27 >>
28 >> My problem was that *sometimes* (not always) I was unable to unlock my
29 >> session after suspending my laptop or desktop. Reverting back to
30 >> systemd-204 solved it, so I'm assuming that's the problem, although I
31 >> didn't really investigated the issue.
32 >
33 > This turned out to be an upstream issue. See:
34 >
35 > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67267
36
37 Yeah, I suspected so; that was my theory in the mail I sent yesterday:
38
39 http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/267762
40
41 So it is indeed the new slices code. I'm staying on 204 until 207 comes out.
42
43 Regards.
44 --
45 Canek Peláez Valdés
46 Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
47 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México