1 |
On 14/11/21 12:52 am, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 12:35 AM William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au> wrote: |
3 |
>> Look at the odroid HC4 - I am using 5x the older HC2 version for moosefs |
4 |
>> - they are USB3 based but work well in this application. They are arm32 |
5 |
>> but 64bit is not needed. |
6 |
> I like the idea behind the HC series Odroids, but being limited to 1-2 |
7 |
> drives per node seems a bit contraining. With the USB3 approach there |
8 |
> really is no limit to how many drives I can put on a node, as long as |
9 |
> I don't mind the performance drop. I'm more concerned with static |
10 |
> storage capacity in this case. If you're using 1Gbps ethernet then I |
11 |
> guess two drives is already going to saturate the network if they're |
12 |
> able to read sequentially. |
13 |
> |
14 |
The HC2 works fine with a USB3 disk added to an existing sata drive (I |
15 |
was doing that for awhile using SATA->USB3 adaptors) - however it looks |
16 |
like the HC4 has dropped USB3 and only USB2 is available - backward step |
17 |
in my view. |
18 |
|
19 |
BillK |