1 |
James wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> But, that is the best/only method? |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
> James |
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> |
10 |
|
11 |
There is a way to do this. I used it once but I can't remember the |
12 |
command and I can't find anything in the old emails. I have emails |
13 |
going back a loooong time but maybe not far enough and not sure if my |
14 |
search terms are worth a darn either. |
15 |
|
16 |
I'm not sure but I think the command had something to do with seeing |
17 |
what was used to do direct rendering or something. Anybody recall what |
18 |
I am thinking about? Maybe I am thinking about something unrelated. |
19 |
|
20 |
Dale |
21 |
|
22 |
:-) :-) |