| 1 |
Ok if he is getting anal about whether I reply on the top or on the |
| 2 |
bottom then tough luck. It makes more sense to me that it is on the |
| 3 |
top since: |
| 4 |
a) you dont need to scroll |
| 5 |
b) if you have been following the thread then you know whats been said |
| 6 |
already and if you cant remember you can scroll down to read the |
| 7 |
message. |
| 8 |
c) the only time i will do it in reverse is when quoting what has been said. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
END! |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
On 10/30/05, Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 13 |
> My reply being on top of what you wrote. Some people like it on the |
| 14 |
> bottom. I guess someone will be upset no matter which way you do it. I |
| 15 |
> just like the top so that I don't have to scroll down. My mouse wheel |
| 16 |
> leaves a little to be desired. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Dale |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Ryan Viljoen wrote: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> >Is that better? And while we are on the matter what is top posting? |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
"When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people just |
| 34 |
stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system, for |
| 35 |
free". - Linus Torvalds, 1995 |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives